Plan Daisy

   Article Censored by Moderator "Mr Nuke Buzzcut" at LibertyForum.Org

   A tempest is raging at the Web's premiere Libertarian
discussion forum.  Here is some biased explanation.

[From a post to Liberty Forum:]

   Every discussion forum on the Web is monitored by Israeli loyalists.  This is an organized and, where necessary, supported effort that is perfectly reasonable given the situation of Jews and Israel in the world not only today, but throughout history.  Just as the ADL and the JDL and other organizations are properly watchful for those inimical for whatever reason to the well-being of Jews, and are very good at what they do, so we have among us at Liberty Forum not only those who advocate Israel's interests but those who simply watch for dangers.  I support this, I have never not supported it, and firmly advocate that any discrete and identifiable grouping on whatever basis of association should do likewise.

   What people do with what they learn is another question altogether, the world is full of danger for everybody and everybody should stay on watch for it.  There is nothing "tinfoil hat" about it, ask any mother whether she feels right in ignoring the possibility of dangers to her babies.  And if she has to sneak around and eavesdrop when her daughter is talking on the phone to the guy next door who looks to everybody else like a saint, then more power to her.  I pretty much ignore the possibility of dangers to myself, but only because I've physically watched assassination attempts collapse literally on my doorstep, and every attack on me in the last thirty-five years fail ludicrously and quite often backfire.  But I still look around when I step outside, just out of habit.  It's a good habit.

   I have a cordial relationship with Leon Gralnik, who fields the Meshuryan team at Microsoft Networks in their discussion groups related to Middle East issues ~ right out in the open, "Meshuryan" is in his signature and it has the same definition in Hebrew and in Arabic, it's hasbara and agitprop.  Leon is an expert, and he's surrounded by extremely competent people.  Whenever a discussion begins concerning Israeli atrocities in Palestine, or corruption of American foreign policy in favor of Israeli state terrorism in Palestine or financing or arming it, he and his crew can bring such a flood of obscure details, disinformation reports that opponents are challenged to "disprove" with their own research, and complete and total confusion to the discussion, that they derail just about everything that might disclose something about Israeli state terrorism.  They're very good, and they're there twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, with direct lines to the moderators (one of them is a moderator), to protect Israel's image from the realities unknown to the American people.

   I had a long conversation there with a grandmother working in the GOI Information offices in Tel Aviv (i.e., Mossad).  I have a friendly correspondence with the webmaster head of the Jewish Defense Organization, who links to my website and to a newspaper article about me that was linked here at Liberty Forum (I think by Down_South) and has posted some of what I have written to him on their website.

   One of my former neighbors, whose boys were running buddies with my sons, was a veteran of the Jewish Defense League, and we had pleasant conversations.  I support the Jewish organizations that attempt to arm every Jew in America.  I'm very big on self-sufficiency when it comes to being able to resist attack and tyranny, for everybody and especially for those who realize the importance of that.  And I have a great respect for people who can come together to organize their advocacy in a public discussion forum, and Liberty Forum's Israeli loyalists certainly include some very capable individuals.  We even talk to each other privately because each respects the other's right to believe according to his own lights.  We prefer not to meet alone in dark alleys, but I would no more harm a faithful Jew treacherously than I would lay a hand on a muslim.  And I think my experience supports the belief that my "enemies" are also faithful to their own beliefs.

   We are arrayed in the marketplace of ideas, each advocating a fervently-held vision of humanity.  God Alone will decide what comes of it, "we" are the faithful of all persuasions, and we are all vigilant against the enemies of God and the destroyers of humanity.

   One of the distinguishing characteristics of Liberty Forum, however, is that such vigilance against dangers to the forum itself is prohibited or, at best, reserved exclusively to [site owner] John Deere himself as and when he feels a need to examine something brought to his attention.  Unlike all other discussion forums there is no "nanny brigade" in place at Liberty Forum to arrest discussion that could prove contentious, unproductive, disruptive, or ~ gasp! ~ so runaway popular on the Web that like this Thread, it draws in nearly six thousand page views in four days and floods mailboxes with personal mail every which way from Sunday, that for example portrays Israeli partisan activity ~ the "what they do with it" part ~ in a true light.

   Which is the source of much unruly contention ~ like my signature says:

Divert, distort, denigrate, disrupt or destroy any discussion of the corruption of American liberty by the organized lobby of a foreign power
   And Israel's loyalists are superb at creating a ruckus when their ox is gored, and this Thread is a good example.

   But Liberty Forum is the ONLY place that "allows as free discussion of politics as you will find" here.  It is unique in this respect and this is what makes it attractive to the members and to the rest of the people on the Web, including more and more teams of Israeli loyalists who are aghast that people can talk about Israeli machinations here the way we do and get away with it.

   So let's not lose sight of the diamond.  At Liberty Forum, members can do what cannot be done anywhere else on the Web with a general membership ~ we can turn a certain sacred cow into hamburger and not have the discussion shut down and the advocates banished.

   Until now, that is.


Here is the Liberty Forum article that exposed the operation of an organized Israeli loyalist hasbara operation at Liberty Forum, masquerading as a single individual called "Daisy11" ~ who joined Liberty Forum on November 23, 2002, and had added 11,097 posts by July 20, 2003 ~ 46.43 posts per day for 239 days, posting literally around the clock ...


[NOTE:  Liberty Forum Privacy Policy prohibits posting of 32-bit IP addresses that may tend to locate a private individual member of Liberty Forum.  Following standard Internet usage, the last octet of every IP address posted was replaced with an asterisk.  Information not included in original article, restored or added to this report, is shown in green.  Some spelling has also been corrected.]

   Daisy11 posts regularly from 212.198.0.97, an anonymizing proxy server in Paris; and ALSO shows up in my server logs from 199.182.24.27, 199.182.22.248, 207.221.131.85, 24.62.164.57, 209.234.160.37 (January and February), and from 204.116.106.164, 130.94.107.139, 130.94.106.251 (in July and August).  Get the picture?  Not quite?  Okay ...

   First, notice that there are no Daisy11 entries in my logs for the period from March through June.  That means that whoever was posting as Daisy11 had graphics turned off, my log entries come from graphics hosted on my website ~ some are Skunk's, most are mine, and Babylon's cartoons are there, too ~ and posted in a Thread.  This also means that what I have for those periods is incomplete to the extent that someone at any other IP address had graphics turned off.  It's a standard method, I turn off graphics whenever the Liberty Forum server hangs up on serving all those cutesie little faces and icons ~ which is far too often, they should be hosted elsewhere on a high-volume pipe.  Anyway ...

   212.198.0.97 is celsius.noos.net; noos.net is registered in Paris; no information is available for celsius.noos.net.  Traceroute goes through 24 hops to get there, 14 in the United States, then to London and points south.  Once it gets into noos.net, there's no information available for anything other than an IP address and its canonical name, everything is referred to ARIN in Amsterdam.  The canonical names are not resolved to an IP address by the Domain Name Servers.  It's entirely hidden.  noos.net shows "Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK" at Register.com, where it's registered ~ since 7 December 1999.  AUXIPAR, Didier TATTEVIN, 20, place des vins de France, Paris, 75012 and a telephone number.  The Technical Contact is Euroconnect.fr, Pascal JULIENNE, 130, rue de bourg Bele, Le Mans, 72000, France and another telephone number.

   So I stepped back to the last router address ~ nothing.

   So I stepped back to the noos.net domain name and came up with the Paris registration, and that's IT ~ virtually nothing below that (France came up with a Class A network and no other information).  Someone has veiled this entire domain and there isn't even a way to tell how extensive it is.  It includes AT LEAST two entire Class A networks, each with 16,777,216 IP addresses.

   A huge set of networks masked from routine network scrutiny.  That's Daisy11's home posting address.

   199.182.24.27 is in Placerville, California, a small town east of Sacramento almost to Reno. So is 199.182.22.248; so is 207.221.131.85; no canonical names available for these IP addresses. Network Tracer [free download] comes up a complete blank on all three ~ not even an abuse address, nothing.

   24.62.164.57 is h00104b15bc27.ne.client2.attbi.com which appears to be in Massachusetts. Network Tracer returns no information.

   209.234.160.37 is 209-234-160-37.gen.twtelecom.net ~ traceroute jumps to Anaheim, California, then into twtelecom and disappears. Network Tracer shows it registered in Littleton, Colorado in a block of 24576 IP addresses ~ a relatively small block, it's most likely in Colorado.

   204.116.106.164 is dial-164.r05.tnmmrl.infoave.net; Network Tracer shows it in an IP block of 65536 (relatively small for the area) in Fort Mill, South Carolina.

   130.94.107.139 has no canonical name. PingPlotter goes to San Diego to get to it, that's probably where it is. 130.94.106.251 gives identical results. Network Tracer comes up with a big nothing.

   Now this is where experience comes into the picture. I have run Network Tracer on over eight hundred IP addresses, domain names, email addresses, and canonical names. It's VERY unusual for there to be NO information coming back, and fairly unusual for only sparse information to come back. It does a ping, a netbios query, a nameserver lookup, a whois domain name record query lookup ~ often two of them ~ at every whois server on the planet until it finds a registry entry, an ARIN WhoIs query, a Reverse DNS lookup, and a traceroute. All the information it collects is placed in a text file that's typically from 5K to 20K in size ~ 75% of my Network Tracer files are over 6K.

   These "Daisy11" traces average 3K and some of them have double results, I ran some of them twice ~ once on the IP and once on the canonical name, where there was one.  And I added the results from Steve Gibson's "IDServe" utility and the traceroute timing and router hop tables from Ping Plotter to these files.

   Here we have nine IP addresses located in several countries, ALL of which return NO information or sparse information.  No local ISP names and addresses and telephone numbers, no upstream providers at the next two tiers above the local ISPs ~ these are all very obscured IP addresses, they're not only unlocatable but the nearest "oversight" responsible upstream providers couldn't track any of them down to a town, let alone to a phone number or client name, without taking his own customers through a bureaucratic wringer and possibly a subpoena.

   Now do you get a picture?

   Liberty Forum is a project, and Daisy11 is its name. And that, mind you, is from a PRELIMINARY investigation of slightly over ONE HOUR's duration using very basic, unsophisticated, readily available networking administration tools. And I haven't even gone to Google yet.

   John Deere and the moderators are being worked by a team of sayyanim and their katsa. Systematically.

   But I've known that all along. John Deere thinks it's tinfoil. But I've been at this for thirty years, I know what's out there working to annihilate me and my people.

   The amusing thing is that I don't have to flag any of them ~ they've been tracking my posts all along, just like they track the posts of several other liberty-minded people who are on to their machinations and schemes against American freedom and finance and future prospects.

   Sure is nice of John Deere to set up a place for them to showcase their cabalistic trolling skills.

Divert, distort, denigrate, disrupt or destroy any discussion of the corruption of American liberty by the organized lobby of a foreign power
There's no cabal, no floor party, nothing to see here, move along, Folks.®
Libertarianism ~ a feral territorialism of the mind


And then the fun began ...


[Continuing from the above post to Liberty Forum:]

   Any information regarding the "reality" behind any anonymous handle is not allowed to be posted here.

   You raise this assertion, in the name of privacy and anonymity, far beyond where privacy and anonymity can raise it.

   Daisy11 is anonymous.  This is true of the present Daisy11, after the recent "Daisy11 is locked down tight" (an actual quote) and change in Plan Daisy, and it was and is true of every predecessor Daisy11.  All nine or ten or a hundred "Daisy11" posters of yesterday's Plan Daisy are anonymous.  They are unlocatable, they are hidden from view, they are completely obscured, by design and intent, as I have shown in spades.  I could go further with proofs, but not within the existing restraints on disclosures ~ no private identifying or locating information is available to be disclosed about the participants in Plan Daisy ~ that is the thrust of my entire argument, and my original post

   Discussing the fact that one "handle" was actually manned by an around-the-clock team with professional expertise and instant access to a tremendous database of facts, contentions, and debate ammunition, is not a "privacy" disclosure.  Proving that Plan Daisy is not a single anonymous individual but several anonymous individuals widely scattered around the globe is not a "privacy" disclosure.  It is a revelation of standard public forum practices engaged in by any political party with the means to field it.

   The problem here, of course, is that it's Israel's partisans who are being illuminated.  And that's the entire extent of the "problem" ~ were it any other group it would not be a "problem" and there would be no claim of "privacy" for how people come into Liberty Forum to advocate their causes.

   It does not matter who posts what here, and why.  What they post, is all.  Why is it such a big issue for you?

   It's not an issue with me.  What's an issue with me is that the members of Liberty Forum have a right to know when someone pretending to be a single Liberty Forum member is actually a score of people operating as a team.  And what's an issue with me is that you and some others at Liberty Forum want to suppress discussion of that simple fact, with particulars that do not identify any private individual at all, on the completely specious grounds of protecting someone's privacy.

   That's bogus, it's illegitimate, it's a prior restraint on free discussion, it aids in defrauding Liberty Forum members, and it's not worthy of John Deere's commitment to open discussion of political issues ~ and this is a political issue relevant to liberty.

   "Daisy11" has been replaced now.

   So let's talk about all those "Daisy11" Israeli loyalists who were all pretending to be one person just a little while ago.

   It's not an uncommon thing.  It's a gorilla in the parlor.  And you say we can't mention it?

   How do you reckon?  How do you call yourself a supporter of open discussion?  How can you describe yourself as a libertarian?

   You want to bury the truth that everybody at Liberty Forum can see like an open book.


   Read the discussion of the ethics of a team pretending to be a single individual in virtual advocacy, and of exposing that deception.

   Join the discussion at the Web's premiere Libertarian discussion forum.